Ranting is not Speaking

Last week I had the misfortune of attending a "lecture" on the Eichmann Trial, in Palm Desert.  

71529.jpg

I don't remember who put it on and I'm not going to mention the speakers by name because I don't want to embarrass them.  At least two were sweet older gentlemen and a third was an academic from Loyola Marymount (who seriously needs speaker training).

I will say, however, that I walked out of the lecture mid-way, after the third speaker.  Can't remember ever doing that.

Now why would I do that?  Because the speakers weren't speaking, they were ranting.  And even worse, they were ranting to the wrong audience.  The audience of probably 100+ attendees was made up of 50 - 80 year old Jews.  This is an audience who already knows the damage of the holocaust and the evilness of those who perpetrated it.  Some of them were probably survivors and lots of them have family who didn't survive.

This was supposed to be a lecture and discussion about the Eichmann Trial itself. 

Instead what we got was as follows (at least until I walked out):

They started the program without telling us what was going to occur and instead just played video clips from you tube. OK, I'll play along for a minute or two, but unfortunately they didn't bother to download any videos to their computer, nor did they bother to download the links directly to their desktop.

So we got to watch them go into their email for video clip link after video clip link.  Yep, we got to see their email list, and each email that they went into to get the clip. Oh, and there was the nifty "so and so is now online" Skype pop up that entertained us every few minutes as well.

Unfortunately they tortured us with this silliness for about 15 minutes, the last 8 - 10 of which was just streaming download pauses and 10 seconds of video then another streaming download pause.  

The only thing more irritating than sitting at a speech/lecture and watching a video try to download is watching Oscar speeches.

Bad enough.... but then...

Speaker #1/MC: basically just told a story of his father's escape from Germany.  I'm guessing more than half the audience had heard similar stories from their own parents while growing up.  What was the point? 

Speaker #2: basically paced back and forth telling us how evil Eichmann was and how Hannah Arendt's "the Banality of Evil" was completely baseless.  OK... tell this audience something they don't know already.  And stop pacing, it's distracting.

Speaker #3: this lovely older gentleman was the worst, simply because all he did was rant about what a horrible person FDR was and how he was totally complicit in the Holocaust.  Still not sure what he was trying to do either. 

I walked out after Speaker #3.

What are the lessons?

  • Organize your conferences even if you are an all-volunteer force. Your audience should be treated with respect and that means respecting our time. Even retired people get annoyed when their time is wasted.
  • Prepare your audio and video in advance.  Either:
    • download the video onto your hard drive (preferable), or
    • put the direct link to the video on your desktop so we don't have to see all of your emails and wait for you to find the right link
  • When preparing your audio and video clips in advance, you also need to
    • Make sure the facility has adequate streaming capability, or go wired, and still make sure there is adequate streaming capability.  
    • If there isn't, you have to download to your hard drive or find another source.  
    • Make sure you remember to kill all programs on your computer and turn off all alerts, so we don't sit there watching your email, Skype and IM alerts.
  • Meet your audience's needs - not your own.  I've said this a million times before. If you make this mistake, you can't recover.  
  • Prepare an actual presentation, with an outline and all, or at least a few talking points.'
    • Don't rant. We don't care about your rants.  Rants turn an audience off and make them uncomfortable.
    • Don't rant. Speak to us, be thoughtful, organized, easy to follow.  Have a point.  Have three main points if you want people to follow you.
    • Don't rant. What is the point of your presentation? Decide in advance and create one - don't wing it or you may end up ranting.

Moral of the Story:  Passion is good.  Ranting is bad.  

 

Word of the Day: Meanderthal

Today when I was reading Entrepreneur Magazine, I came across this word listed under their Jargon column:

Meanderthal: a person who has great difficulty expressing themselves succinctly, often giving long, unfocused presentations.

It got a great laugh out of me! I LOVE it!  And like all good magazines that provide examples of their newly defined words, Entrepreneur provides this one:

I want to gouge my eyes out every time the office meanderthal pulls up a Power Point.

Too funny! 

Not sure I have to comment much on this, other than to use it as an illustration of the fact that people:

  1. don't like it when others take forever to get to the point, especially in a business setting, i.e. meander all over the place
  2. don't like it when others use Power Point to take forever to get to the point

If this sounds familiar to you, as in you might be guilty of communicating in this fashion, it is time to learn how to be organized and succinct. It is also probably time to give up the Power Point addiction, even if everyone else uses it.  Trust me, your colleagues and audiences will thank you and will like your presentations a lot more.

Watch the 9th Circuit En Banc Remotely - and Learn

I just noticed this post at Findaw's 9th Circuit Blog, annoucing that the 9th Circuit will be remote broadcasting hearings in front of the en banc panel next month.

Why do I bring this up? Because if you are an attorney that ever does oral argument - at the trial or appellate level - you should take the time to watch the arguments.  And learn from them.

Here's the schedule.  You have four different opportunities to watch and learn.

I don't know who is appearing, but I can tell you what to look for.

Here are four things you can pay attention to when watching the arguments.  For fun, you may even want to count how many times an attorney doesn't answer the question, or doesn't listen to it, or reads from a speech.  Every time I watch an argument before the 9th I am surprised at how frequently attorneys make these mistakes.  Mistakes that can influence the court's decision.

  1. Do the attorneys arguing listen to the questions before answering? If not, watch the judges to see their reaction.
  2. Are the attorneys reading from a speech, or speaking extemporaneously from an outline? Again, watch the judges to see how they respond to each style of presentation.
  3. Do the attorneys know their case fact and law inside and out? See what happens when they don't.
  4. And the 64,000 dollar question, do the attorneys answer the question?

Now I admit it looks like you'll have to go to one of the 9th Circuit's courthouses to see the broadcast (I'll be headed to the actual hearings in Pasadena), but I promise it will be worth your time.