Want a better connection to your audience? Introduce yourself, one-on-one, before you speak

I've probably addressed this before, but it bears saying again.  And again.  And again.

If you want to start off on the right foot with your audience and control that first impression before you ever speak, introduce yourself.  Instead of staying in the back of the room, or hovering by the podium or panel table reviewing your notes: Introduce Yourself!  

Walk into the room and just go up to the first person you see in the audience and say,

Thumbnail image for WCO_009_7.jpg

Hi, I'm so-and-so and I'm your speaker today. 

Don't be surprised if they give you a wide smile and introduce themselves right back.  Then ask them a bit about themselves, and why they are there or other questions that will give you insight into what it is they want to get out of your presentation.

Then move on and reach out to more attendees.  Try to reach as many as you can up until right before you speak.  

What does this do for you?

First, it gives you more information about your audience, so you can tweak your presentation at the last minute, as needed, to better meet their needs.

Second, it helps break the ice with your audience. It helps break down the speaker/audience barrier and make you seem more human and more approachable.

Why does this matter? Because the more familiar you are to them, the more responsive your audience is going to be to you.

And for those of you that have a fear of public speaking, this is an excellent way to reduce your nerves. You will be busy meeting nice people and learning a little about them instead of standing behind a podium nervously waiting to speak with a tape in your head telling you how afraid you are.

Of course the corollary rule to this is: Thou Shalt Show up 20 - 30 minutes before you speak

Ranting is not Speaking

Last week I had the misfortune of attending a "lecture" on the Eichmann Trial, in Palm Desert.  

71529.jpg

I don't remember who put it on and I'm not going to mention the speakers by name because I don't want to embarrass them.  At least two were sweet older gentlemen and a third was an academic from Loyola Marymount (who seriously needs speaker training).

I will say, however, that I walked out of the lecture mid-way, after the third speaker.  Can't remember ever doing that.

Now why would I do that?  Because the speakers weren't speaking, they were ranting.  And even worse, they were ranting to the wrong audience.  The audience of probably 100+ attendees was made up of 50 - 80 year old Jews.  This is an audience who already knows the damage of the holocaust and the evilness of those who perpetrated it.  Some of them were probably survivors and lots of them have family who didn't survive.

This was supposed to be a lecture and discussion about the Eichmann Trial itself. 

Instead what we got was as follows (at least until I walked out):

They started the program without telling us what was going to occur and instead just played video clips from you tube. OK, I'll play along for a minute or two, but unfortunately they didn't bother to download any videos to their computer, nor did they bother to download the links directly to their desktop.

So we got to watch them go into their email for video clip link after video clip link.  Yep, we got to see their email list, and each email that they went into to get the clip. Oh, and there was the nifty "so and so is now online" Skype pop up that entertained us every few minutes as well.

Unfortunately they tortured us with this silliness for about 15 minutes, the last 8 - 10 of which was just streaming download pauses and 10 seconds of video then another streaming download pause.  

The only thing more irritating than sitting at a speech/lecture and watching a video try to download is watching Oscar speeches.

Bad enough.... but then...

Speaker #1/MC: basically just told a story of his father's escape from Germany.  I'm guessing more than half the audience had heard similar stories from their own parents while growing up.  What was the point? 

Speaker #2: basically paced back and forth telling us how evil Eichmann was and how Hannah Arendt's "the Banality of Evil" was completely baseless.  OK... tell this audience something they don't know already.  And stop pacing, it's distracting.

Speaker #3: this lovely older gentleman was the worst, simply because all he did was rant about what a horrible person FDR was and how he was totally complicit in the Holocaust.  Still not sure what he was trying to do either. 

I walked out after Speaker #3.

What are the lessons?

  • Organize your conferences even if you are an all-volunteer force. Your audience should be treated with respect and that means respecting our time. Even retired people get annoyed when their time is wasted.
  • Prepare your audio and video in advance.  Either:
    • download the video onto your hard drive (preferable), or
    • put the direct link to the video on your desktop so we don't have to see all of your emails and wait for you to find the right link
  • When preparing your audio and video clips in advance, you also need to
    • Make sure the facility has adequate streaming capability, or go wired, and still make sure there is adequate streaming capability.  
    • If there isn't, you have to download to your hard drive or find another source.  
    • Make sure you remember to kill all programs on your computer and turn off all alerts, so we don't sit there watching your email, Skype and IM alerts.
  • Meet your audience's needs - not your own.  I've said this a million times before. If you make this mistake, you can't recover.  
  • Prepare an actual presentation, with an outline and all, or at least a few talking points.'
    • Don't rant. We don't care about your rants.  Rants turn an audience off and make them uncomfortable.
    • Don't rant. Speak to us, be thoughtful, organized, easy to follow.  Have a point.  Have three main points if you want people to follow you.
    • Don't rant. What is the point of your presentation? Decide in advance and create one - don't wing it or you may end up ranting.

Moral of the Story:  Passion is good.  Ranting is bad.  

 

Vital Speeches of the Day: How long should you practice your speech?

I love Vital Speeches of the Day, one of the few blogs I read on a semi-regular basis. 

WCO_005_7.jpg

I just came across this very short post "How long should you practice your speech" and I recommend it for everyone. I get this question at every public speaking training program I teach, i.e. a lot.

And every time I answer the question, I usually get blank stares or looks of disbelief.  It's hard convincing very busy people to add more work to their schedules.  

But there really is no "easy" button when it comes to giving a good speech (much less an excellent one).

So read the post so you know I'm not the only person out there telling you to practice your speech - a lot - if you want to do it well.

 

 

From Vital Speeches of the Week: "Oops, we meant 'weak' -- A cautionary tale about impromptu speaking"

John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, recently gave his State of the State Address to an elementary school on February 7th this year.  Those poor kids. They will probably be confused for life.  They certainly won't be inspired to lead or speak in public.

This edited version, highlighting the most idiotic things Governor Kasich said, is pretty funny.  The speech lasted 80 minutes or so.  Again, those poor kids.

I'm sure somewhere in the jumbled 80 minutes he might have said something of substance, this is admittedly an edited version just capturing the choice phrases, but seriously?

As Vital Speechs of the Day points out... this is the hazard of impromptu speaking.  

Nobody needs to sound this stupid.

Or look this stupid.

Someone really needs to tell this guy how to dress when speaking in public.  That shirt, tie and suit combo is atrocious, sloppy and the colors clash.  There is more to dressing than wearing a red tie.

 

 

 

Upcoming ABA Premier Speaker Series Free Webinar

On Monday December 19th at 1:00 Central Time, Rick Levin and I will be presenting a webinar entitled "Powerful Public Speaking In and Out of Court."  

This is for the ABA's new Premier Speaker CLE Series and is free to ABA Members.  1.5 CLE units are available.  

Sign up for their announcements if you are a member of the ABA.  They expect to have some outstanding speakers during the next 12 months.

 

 

CLE Speakers NEED Public Speaking Training

This past week I spoke at a State Bar convention.  I had a great audience (with a few of the usual exceptions, to be blogged about next), and I had fun giving the presentation.

I presented a shortened version of one of my attorney speaking seminars "Improving your Public Speaking Skills." The host of the event invited my company to exhibit in exchange for my presentation, which was great because I (and my staff) stayed for a great deal longer than usual and we had much more interaction with the event attendees as well. 

While walking around the exhibit hall for 2.5 days I chatted up a bunch of the attendees.  And, unfortunately,boring seminar photo.jpg the consensus was that the vast majority of speakers at the annual convention needed public speaking training - before they presented their CLEs to the bar attendees.

I know this is a pretty common issue, since I used to be a practicing attorney and I know how bad CLE programs can get. Additionally, my company puts on 60 - 70 CLE ligitation skills training programs per year; so I even know that some speakers are resistant to public speaking training and suggestions for improvement.

What I don't understand is why bar associations don't make the investment and offer training programs, or DVDs, to the attorneys who are going to speak at the bar's annual event.  It's a small investment compared to the event budget and income and the rewards always outweigh the cost.

I understand that not all of the speakers will take you up on your offered training, but enough of them will to make a difference and to cut down on attendees' dissapointment and complaints.

Not surprisingly several attendees told me they weren't sure they would return the next year due to the quality of presentations they saw.

man praying-pleading.jpg

Here is an open plea to bar associations:

You don't have to hire me to train your CLE speakers at your annual events, but you do have to hire someone.  Or at least license someone's training program to distribute to your speakers.  

Or maybe even just buy Garr Reynold's Presentation Zen or Nancy Duarte's Slide:ology in bulk and send them off to all CLE speakers booked for your annual event.  Yes, I really wish I'd written one of these books 20 years ago when I first started complaining about Power Point.

Seriously, do something! 

 

 

Word of the Day: Meanderthal

Today when I was reading Entrepreneur Magazine, I came across this word listed under their Jargon column:

Meanderthal: a person who has great difficulty expressing themselves succinctly, often giving long, unfocused presentations.

It got a great laugh out of me! I LOVE it!  And like all good magazines that provide examples of their newly defined words, Entrepreneur provides this one:

I want to gouge my eyes out every time the office meanderthal pulls up a Power Point.

Too funny! 

Not sure I have to comment much on this, other than to use it as an illustration of the fact that people:

  1. don't like it when others take forever to get to the point, especially in a business setting, i.e. meander all over the place
  2. don't like it when others use Power Point to take forever to get to the point

If this sounds familiar to you, as in you might be guilty of communicating in this fashion, it is time to learn how to be organized and succinct. It is also probably time to give up the Power Point addiction, even if everyone else uses it.  Trust me, your colleagues and audiences will thank you and will like your presentations a lot more.

Why do I need to say this: Don't chew gum when speaking in public. Really?

I just wrapped up a 10 day business/speaking trip in three cities: Boston, Chicago and Toronto. And if you have to be away from home for 10 days, those are great cities to visit!  

I gave three presentations during the trip - two at ACLEA (the American Continuing Legal Education Association) in Boston and one at the ABA's National Convention in Toronto.  And I mean it Australia... I'll waive my speaking fee if you pay my travel - you're on my bucket list to visit!

Anyway, I had a blast!

Speaking in public is what I love to do and this particular trip was especially fun.  I met a ton of great folks and had some wonderful, interesting conversations.  A judge from Toronto stayed after my program to chat for almost an hour about speaking skills and teaching younger students at law schools.  And there were at least five or six international attendees, including Spain, France, Poland, Australia, Italy and I can't remember where else.  

International bar associations take note:  For the next year or so, I''ll waive my speaking fees just for the fun of getting to travel internationally again, if my travel is picked up for at least 4 days.

But back to the point of this blog...

I received a follow up email earlier this week from the Managing Editor of a large legal publication, who will remain anonymous.  He was very sweet in his compliments about my program and then he went on to write something hilarious and a bit surprising.  

He said:

You offered a terrific program. It’s very interesting how the structure of a good oral presentation is the same as a good written article: short statement to start; a cogent intro; the main body in which one makes specific points followed by examples; and then a strong conclusion. 

Unfortunately, after attending your program, I was attuned to spotting only the flaws in the other presentations, and it became very, very painful.

Please inform future classes that they must never chew gum or use the word “like.” It is impossibly irritating.

girl chewing gum small (1).jpg

Ok, I'll admit, I added the bold.  

Yes, someone at the ABA National Convention was actually chewing gum while speaking to an audience and someone else was saying "like" enough during their presentation to irritate my new colleague.

I could go on and on about why you shouldn't do either of these things, but that would be kind of silly. Frankly this is one of those times when it is obvious and and while I strive not to be snarky on my blog, all I can think to say is...

chewing gum while speaking....  really? seriously?

 

 

An Hysterical Example of Power Point Backlash

Hats off to the genius behind this graphic and hilarious illustration of the backlash surrounding Power Point - Doug Zongkers.  

If you have any doubt that there is a backlash, the audience's reaction to this presentation should dispel that doubt.  And this was presented at the AAAS humor session on February 16, 2007!

Another way to look at this presentation is that is a great example of how audiences view and receive - i.e. hear - the most common type of speech/Power Point presentations.

Hats off to Jennifer Ellis (via Ashton Treadway and Barb Cahill) for posting it on Facebook as well!

Screen shot 2011-05-17 at 4.22.30 PM.png

Public Speaking for Business Development

Tomorrow we are holding our Free "Public Speaking for Business Development" Webinar.  Update: Here is the link for the audio recording with slides. 

This webinar "sold out" at more than 120 attendees late last week.  If you are interested in this program, you should still sign up so you are put on the waiting list. We will email you when we hold it again, which will be in the next month or two.  Additionally, we are recording the program and will make it available on our website and on this blog.

PS 4 Attys cartoon used - small web version.jpgWhat You Will Learn if You Attend This Seminar

Getting speaking engagements:

  • How to use your blog to land public speaking engagements
  • Selecting your audience
  • Who to approach
  • How to ask – what matters to the folks booking speakers

 

Making speaking engagements worthwhile:

  • Making speaking engagements worthwhile
  • Knowing your audience
  • Preparing properly
  • Marketing before and after to maximize the value of the event

I did a survey of our attendees before hand, and based on the results of that survey (about at 30% response rate), I realize that there are a few misconceptions regarding how one uses public speaking for business development. I'll start covering that topic more over the next few months on this blog.  

Picture1.jpg

There are a few things I will say now, however, about tomorrow's webinar:

  • Public Speaking for Business Development will cover the toipcs listed above; I will not be teaching many public speaking/presentation skills in this program, as that is not the focus of this program. 

If you are interested in learning how to be a better public speaker, please attend one of my public speaking programs, or purchase our Public Speaking for Attorneys DVD.  We will offer a 10% off discount coupon for our DVD for anyone that is interested (just email us or include a comment here).

  • I will not be teaching sales techniques. Public speaking for business development is not about making a sale or closing a deal, especially not on or from the platform.  

Using public speaking for business development is a long term investment in your reputation and your relationships, which translate to clients and referrals. Sometimes it translates immediately, sometimes it takes months, and like a lot of business development, sometimes it takes years.  Unfortunately, there is no "easy" button.

  • Paid Public Speaking is a different animal altogether. If you are interested in learning more about the paid public speaking profession, I recommend you check out the National Speakers Association (NSA).  Most cities have a local chapter that you can join as an associate.

Because it merits its own few hours or days, and is of little interest to the majority of attorneys who attend our programs, I will not cover paid professional speaking in the webinar listed above.  

I am happy to answer any questions related to paid professional speaking; just shoot me an email or post a comment.

Speaking Too Fast can Kill a Good Speech

Speaking Too Fast can Kill a Good Speech.  It seems like a bit of common sense, but it's a hard habit to break, even for highly paid professional speakers.

And it's a very detremintal habit. 

Last week I attended a Smart Meetings conference held at the Ritz Carlton, Dana Point, created for people who plan meetings.  Since my company holds about 60 CLE seminars a year, I decided to finally attend one and see if I could get some new ideas.  It was a terrific conference, by the way.  One of the most organized conferences I have ever attended and the Ritz Carlton managed it so impressively, I am considering holding a long-weekend destination CLE event there in 2012 or 2013.

But back to the topic.

The keynote speaker was Peter Vidmar. Peter was part of the amazing men's gymnastics team that won the first ever team gold medal at the Olympics in 1984.  He also won a couple of individual event medals as well. The stories he tells from this time are simply captivating.

Peter does paid motivational speaking now, represented by Keppler Speakers, and he was there to kick off the conference.  

Now, here's an incredibly fit, handsome man, with some great stories to tell us.

pommel_horse_2.jpg

The high moments of his presentation included his stories and his gymnastics demonstrations on the pommel horse (tied in to his stories of course) - very cool!

But, unfortunately, a lot of people had a hard time following Peter throughout large portions of the program. Why? Because he just spoke too fast.  He'd get on a roll and just keep on going.  

While I could follow him, I have to admit that after about 20 minutes of the incredibly fast pace I found myself checking my watch and wondering how much longer I had to sit there.  Not good.  

Here's a guy with unbeleivable charm, a great sense of comedic timing, teriffic facial expressions, body movements and gestures, and an interesting message.  But when he started telling some of his more intense stories, he'd start sort of pacing, with his head down looking at the floor and his story would just fall out of his mouth whipcord fast.  The issue was definitely a topic of conversation at the cocktail hour later in the evening.

So the moral of the story is... 

  • even paid professional speakers aren't perfect
  • you can seriously damage a potentially terrific presentation by speaking way too fast
  • and of course... if you can add gymnastics demonstration to your speech, well there's some teriffic use of physically showing the audience what you are talking about... too bad we're not all gymnasts.

The fast talking wasn't the only issue with his presentation, but it was the least forgivable.  

Obviously as a successful corporate speaker, Peter's clients and audiences forgive him of this habit or he wouldn't continue to book large events.

But I couldn't help thinking about how much better he'd be with a little bit of help himself.

My favorite type of speaker(s) to book for a seminar

Last week we held our annual Superior Court Boot Camp at the Arctic Hotel in Seattle (what a gorgeous restoration - can't believe it is a DoubleTree).

And I have to share a bit about our one of my favorite speakers to book.

Judge Paris Kallas retired last July after 15 years on the bench in King County. She is now a neutral at a small ADR firm called Judicial Dispute Resolution LLC in Seattle.

Judge Kallas is one of my favorite people to book at our seminars because she is a joy to work with and a pleasure to meet and chat with.  Yes, I'm ending in a prepositional phrase; live with it.

Judge Kallas cheerfully joins our planning conference calls, gives us her handouts and input in a timely manner and always has a smile for my staff and I on the day of our program.  Even the first time I met her a year ago it was like we were old friends.

There's something about that kind of warmth and welcoming presence that just makes you feel good.

And, in case you're thinking I only like booking her for her sparkling personality, she is a great presenter, provides practical, useful tips, and always gets great evaluations.  She knows her stuff when it comes to trial practice.

This isn't to say that all the other panelists on that particular panel weren't fantastic, they were. I enjoyed talking with and working with all of them.  Judge Tim Bradshaw has an incredible sense of humor, great advice, and he pinch hit for Judge Spector, so we owe him one.  Loren Dunn of Riddell Williams has spoken for us several times and he always works on providing an excellent, informative, practical presentation and a charming presence to boot.  Steve Fogg of Corr Cronin joined the gang like the old pro that he is and Judge Jim Rogers always has insightful, interesting advice to provide.  Glenn Draper substituted in for Matt Bergman, both of Bergman Draper & Frockt, and both worth listening to.

This year we were joined by plaintiff's attorney Mike Wampold, who managed to join us while in the middle of a trial - an impressive feat!  

What made the entire program work so well however, was the great interaction between the panelists.  They had fun, they joked with each other and the audience and they did it while presenting useful, practical litigation tips and strategy all the while.

Now that's a conference that makes me happy to be a part of.  Yep, another prepositional phrase. 

Just for fun, here's a picture of the seminar room.  For once I didn't mind not having any windows!  

SEAACDT_Doubletree_Arctic_Club_Hotel_Seattle-Downtown_gallery_meetings_maindome5_large_3.jpg

 

Not Much in the Way of Interesting speeches at the 83rd Annual Academy Awards

oscar.jpgLast night was the 83rd Academy Awards.  Thank god for DVRs.  I get to see who wins, check out the fabulous gowns, listen to the funny hosts (not so funny last night) and… I can fast forward through the obligatory awful thank you litany in 99% of the acceptance “speeches.”  Woo Hoo!

So a few comments about the speeches.  First, a disclaimer – I didn’t listen to every speech. If the speaker started with a long list of thank you’s (very bad way to start) I promptly fast forwarded past it.  That said, here goes.

No stand out speeches last night.  Not one.  Totally disappointing.  Usually there are at least one or two folks who manage to say something poignant (more than “oh my god”) or meaningful.

Not last night. 

The hosts were even boring, though Annie Hatthaway was adorable and effervescent.  She couldn’t help it if the writing sucked.  James franco was boring and stiff.  Who knows, maybe they asked him to play it that way as a counter to Annie’s animated personality.  I want Billy Crystal and Steve Martin back. 

But back to the “speeches. “

The highlight of the evening as far as speeches goes, came from David Seidler, Thumbnail image for David+Seidler+King+Speech+Party+2010+Toronto+wu7VpFX4ljXl.jpgwho won Best Original Screen Play for The King’s Speech.  And that's not saying much about the quality of speeches.

This was his first nomination and award.  In his 70’s, Mr. Seidler started off with a great quip:

"my dad always said I would be a late bloomer"

drawing a round of laughs. 

He went on to say, “I believe I am the oldest person to win this particular award. I hope that record is broken quickly and often” a not so subtle and important reminder about the tendency of Hollywood to hire and reward the younger crowd more often than not, despite the phenomenal talent and experience of people over the age of 35. 

Mr. Seidler then devolved into the usual thank you litany after that, unfortunately, but it was mercifully short.  He then ended with “I accept on behalf of all the stutterers of the world.. . we have a voice, we have been heard, thank you the academy.”

So, he started off pretty good.  But the problem with his ending is twofold: 1) who knew Mr. Seidler was a childhood stutterer? and, 2) was The King’s Speech really about giving “a voice” to stutterers world-wide?  

the kings speech.jpgIf it was, I think I missed that message in the movie.  I thought it was more about the relationship between the King and his instructor, and about the internal suffering the main character endured and about his overcoming the huge obstacle of stuttering, given his need to speak publicly so much.  To me it was a fantastic movie about overcoming the overwhelming barrier of stuttering, but it didn’t feel like it was about “giving voice” to stutterers.

What this means from an acceptance speech point of view is that you need to think ahead about what type of message you want to convey when you accept your award – it matters.  And thinking about whether your audience will hear that message matters as well. 

A better ending would have been to say “I accept on behalf of all the stutterers of the world.. . who now know they can overcome it, just like I did, and just like King George did.”

Next post will include some tips on how to handle acceptance speeches, even at the Academy Awards.

Ladies - See Corporette's latest post on comfortable, stylish pumps

Whether speaking in the courtroom or out of it, finding comfortable shoes that are also professional, appropriate and stylish is always a challenge as a woman.  Sometimes it is my biggest challenge - as my closet full of uncomfortable pumps that I rarely wear proves.

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for stylish pumps.jpg

I have been on the hunt for a new pair of "speaking pumps" since my lovely puppy Jax (see photos here) destroyed my tried and true Nine West simple black pumps.  I almost cried.

Now that my back-up pair of speaking pumps is gone too (see my previous post), I have been checking out Corporette's latest "Guide to Comfortable Heels, offering a list of brand options at various prices.  

And remember - when in court or speaking in public, always go for the professional pump. 

Always bring an extra pair of shoes when travelling to public speaking engagments

When you have a speaking engagement to which you have to travel, bring an extra pair of shoes and an extra shirt - just in case!

In the last two weeks of January we held eight seminars in 10 days (and I'll never do that again!). During one week I was in Sacramento for three seminars, then drove to San Francisco to teach my Public Speaking for Attorneys program.  Unfortunately, I left my favorite "public speaking" heels at the hotel in Sacramento.  Luckily, I had an extra pair of black heels to go with my suit, so I didn't have to speak in slippers.  

My co-speaker, however, was not so lucky. He forgot his good speaking shoes and had to speak in loafers.

iStock_000011655620XSmall.jpg

I guarantee you his feet were more comfortable than mine, but he was embarrassed about the shoes.

What not to wear when speaking in public - even if you're a good speaker

So, first I can tell you what I don't know about the speaker pictured below:

  1. I don't know who this speaker is; and, 
  2. I don't know if she is any good at speaking in public.

And now I can tell you what I do know:

  1. This is a horrible outfit for speaking in public

Why?  

First, the jacket is too tight, so it stretches too much across the chest when she gestures.  

Second, she has too much "stuff" on her; it's distracting.  Get rid of the name tag, the pin and the necklace. I know, I know, organizers always hand you (and me) a name tag when you speak at their events.  Thank them and put it away until after you speak; it's not like anyone in the audience can read it anyway.

Third, you want to wear color on the inside - your shirt - and dark on the outside - your suit jacket.  This brings people's attention to your center and your face, instead of the other way around.

And last - what is that jacket anyway?  Is that a cardigan?  Michelle Obama may be making cardigan's popular in the work place (according to the Careerist), but don't even think of wearing one when speaking in public (unless your audience is full of women doing the same).

badspeakingclothes1.gif